bal

balalthough the actual reality was President_Obama2013-10-13 14:49:11 you attempted to claim < President_Obama > 10/12 15:53:43 that a million returns on 29 hour work week somehow buttressed your argument that ACA was creating a part-time workforce setting aside that you didn't google it properly, and claimed 1 million returns on that "phrase," you also didn't bother to see if writers were saying the phrase "29 hour work week" as they were demolishing the claim with analysis, you simply assumed they were in concurrence with the statement you are an amateur, a moron and a fool who is not worthy to lick my boots, let aside criticize anything I post HAHAHAHA! balYesterday his finest moment was to disprove DBagain12013-10-13 14:47:51Google as a search engine by proving that Obama is from Neptune returns results. I Googled 29 hour work week without quotes - and got more results than I would have gotten if I'd used quotes ... and this set him off for, I kid you not FOUR HOURSreaWe can get out of this mess if we cut spending& gatorhowlie2013-10-13 14:45:24cut llop[holes in tax cadoe - i.e.gouge the shiite out of Romeny and fiendsreaPay me bitch, I want my $10,000 § bushworstever2013-10-13 14:45:13bal*crickets* guess your OP was BS, like I said. § examinerjohn2013-10-13 14:43:49balHow a thread with Ni goes. (With Comments!) beanorpj2013-10-13 14:43:411. I say Democrats in Congress have attached strings to several debt limit increases in the past 2. I provide the text of those amendments. 3. Ni Demands a link (-This is a common liberal tactic. They ask for a link. They rarely actually want to read more and discuss the topic. Instead, they want to waste your time. This leads into two other tactics.) 4. I provide a link 5. Ni laughs, because it's a 3rd party server showing a peer-reviewed paper. (This is one of the lead-in tactics, the Ad Hominem attack. It doesn't matter "what" is linked to, but the source, rather than the material is attacked. The second lead in tactic posts a piece of the original story that says something else. It doesn't contradict your part, but implies other things when taken out of context) 6. I give Ni the primary server (To which she doesn't have access probably) 7. Ni changes tactics, saying I'm trying to "conflate" the shutdown and debt limit. (-You can tell Ni is starting to lose here. The Topic change is key) 8. I mention I haven't said anything about the shutdown. Everything in the post, and the previous 2 posts has explicitly said "debt limit" 9. Ni says the debt limit "not the issue" 10. I mention that Ni doesn't think the debt limit is an issue. 11. Ni says "Separate issue, liar" (Once Ni starts using "Liar", she has no better arguments. You're well on the way to winning now.) 12. Once again, I mention I never said anything about the shutdown in the previous or current posts. 13. Next, Ni switches tactics, saying I used the word "Clean" (Again, a tactic change. Ni can't admit defeat on the previous two) 14. I mention that there's a demand for a clean debt limit increase. With links. 15. Ni: "We're done here, you lying shill". ("Lying Shill. Stage II Ni breakdown) 16. I mentioned Ni appears to have vanished. 17. Ni returns, saying there's "No issue" with amendments attached to debt limit increases 18. I post a few more links showing the issues 19. Ni vanishes again. (Stage III Ni Breakdown).Pubies following Ted Crude to the Gates of Hell Call_Me_Barn2013-10-13 14:43:30and I couldn't be happier about it... oh no , I could not hey dumbass, I was on radio and TV protesting it § RM125N2013-10-13 14:42:56unkNo I don't. As usual you're a horse's ass DBagain12013-10-13 14:42:34complaining about Gerrymandering is what the whining losers retreat to when they can't face the prospect that there are other people who disagree with them. unkRetarded cons, never say I didn't warn you... Pantheist_12013-10-13 14:41:46jln The Republicans blamed Clinton for the shutdown, < Pantheist_1 > 2013-10-01 01:03:54 and Clinton blamed the Republicans. Public opinion favored the president; Clinton's approval rating rose to the highest it had been since his election. The Republicans' support was further diminished two days later when Gingrich made a widely-reported complaint about being snubbed by Clinton; Tom DeLay called it "the mistake of his [Gingrich's] life".unkFile it under "Waaah, I'm a Loser Lib!" § RM125N2013-10-13 14:39:40both parties gerrymander JohnnyTrigger2013-10-13 14:38:14Here is an analysis of 10 such egregiously gerrymandered districts. I was surprised to see that 9 of 10 were Dem districts. I would have figured Dems and Reps would have close to equal representation. I am sure there many other gerrymandered districts that favor GOP. http://www.nationaljournal.com/hotline/redistricting/modern-gerrymanders-10-most-contorted-congressional-districts-maps-20120330 FL-14 (D) IL-4 (D) IL-7 (D) MD-2 (D) MD-3 (D) NC-1 (D) NC-12 (D) OH-9 (D) PA-7 (R) TX-35 (D) balhow am I pissed off? § examinerjohn2013-10-13 14:38:11balIf I link will you apologize? § beanorpj2013-10-13 14:35:22rea there you go. Health and welfare mentioned. commie__bastard2013-10-13 14:35:08I will,take both. reaI think gay marriage was mentioned just twice. § commie__bastard2013-10-13 14:33:52balI didn't really care to. § notsochristianjohn2013-10-13 14:33:49psu"... and I looked and I beheld a pale horse ... DBagain12013-10-13 14:32:49and the name that sat upon him was Gilligan"wdcI don't know what would happen gorags2013-10-13 14:32:08 what the tea party wants is for the government to stop spending more than what it takes inwdcNat'l park shut down in my state! gatorhowlie2013-10-13 14:31:56Thwen I saw a nat'l park trucks stopped out on the interstate; funny how things go.reaI keep looking in the constitution for the words commie__bastard2013-10-13 14:30:44Same sex marriage. I can never find them. balWhy did Obama allow Illegal Immigrants on the beanorpj2013-10-13 14:30:08National Mall? I thought the parks were shut down. Or are they just shut down for WWII Vets, not for Illegal Immigrant rallies...reaI check each time you idiots claim it's a right notsochristianjohn2013-10-13 14:28:53so I check often. You've been wrong everytime!reaWhere are j-walking laws mentioned in the Irony_Guy_Returns2013-10-13 14:28:38Constitution? I keep looking!reanah I'm done, they aren't there. § notsochristianjohn2013-10-13 14:28:08pdxA liberal always resorts to Honest_Wench2013-10-13 14:27:06name calling, insulting hatred. That's all they have. Not facts, not educated dialogue, not intellectual engagement. Just juvenile insults. I don't believe for a second that you were a service member; they typically have too much respect for themselves to act like you do. Perhaps you should run back to the playground now with the rest of the kids.reaI keep looking in the constitution for the words notsochristianjohn2013-10-13 14:24:29"health care" I never find them.unkWord on the street in Europe jesushasmyback2013-10-13 14:23:37is that you can never underestimate the stupidity of Republicans. I confess I've made no effort to convince anyone otherwise.reaI love some of the Dummies who watch Fux News Call_Me_Barn2013-10-13 14:23:19They get their Social Security and Medicare ...and when questioned on their dislike for Gov't Programs and Entitlements say .. " These are not Entitlements " !! HA ha ha .... Of course they are ... the American people are entitled to Soc Security as we have paid into it all out lives and Health Care as part of a rich industrilaized society is as much of an entitlement as National Defense is .... and this is a wrap albI support that. § 2drunk2Pstraight2013-10-13 14:21:40

This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://page2rss.com/337c1e41bac91a7c641d5c9b975f43a7/6728044_6728359/bal