bey

beyI wish I could have used it to irradiate my ball StealthLezzy2013-10-27 18:18:56sSee San Francisco schools, all Chinese. doggie4152013-10-27 18:18:52See who owns real estate in SF, Chinese. While we were sleeping and partying in the 70s they were quietly buying the town. Some older Commie said to me during the summer of love " Don't work for the man" i LISTENED TO HIM. Thats where it started in the 60sI knew you'd run away § KenSalazar2013-10-27 18:17:51wdcI didn't like Clinton but at least he had JH722013-10-27 18:16:49real-world executive experience as Governor of Arkansas. Obama never managed ANYTHING more then a staff of 5 or 6 people until he was thrust into position where he suddenly has to "rise above" the whole management thing. So no wonder we are stuck with a total leadership void.Shampooing w preperation H I see § GETREEL2013-10-27 18:14:34Yes, I finally found my home. § doggie4152013-10-27 18:13:39sfoIf you can't debunk it, I don't need another one § Cirque_du_GOP2013-10-27 18:13:38sfoAnother example of atruther2013-10-27 18:13:35sound-bite polotics with no truth. Dems do it so much I really think they believe the lies. Oh the cons are not any better. Both will follow a talking bag of crap as long as it their party. Idiots. sfoI'm still waiting § Cirque_du_GOP2013-10-27 18:12:50sfoDid I say it wasn't true? 2013-10-27 18:12:21Why do you put your trust in MM?? thats 2 questions you can't answersfoI would vote for Hitler at this point doggie4152013-10-27 18:11:57and I used to be a liberal, far left.sfoI'll wait till you two debunk it § Cirque_du_GOP2013-10-27 18:10:43Good I will vote for them § doggie4152013-10-27 18:10:14Hey, Stupid, it didn't matter, anyway Wyne_E_DemoTyke2013-10-27 18:09:45Edison's DC model was quickly taken over by Tesla's more powerful AC generators. I actually read Tesla's biography, Professor Dork. sfoIt's not just Fox, cons are lied to daily Cirque_du_GOP2013-10-27 18:08:51Fox News panelists distort health insurance policy changes News watchdog Media Matters called out Fox News Sunday host Chris Wallace for hyping reports that insurers are cancelling health plans. Wallace failed to mention that new policies will offer better coverage at comparable cost. Citing figures from a Kaiser Health News article, Wallace claimed the article showed people losing health insurance, not gaining it, Media Matters reported. “Panelist Brit Hume complained that people were being forced into coverage ‘for things they may feel they don’t need’ … but Wallace neglected to cite the section of the article that noted that ‘the new policies will offer consumers better coverage, in some cases, for comparable cost — especially after the inclusion of federal subsidies for those who qualify.’” the group said. Watch their report about Chris Wallace and Fox News Sunday below. http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2013/10/27/media-matters-fox-news-panelists-distort-health-insurance-policy-changes/ But if cons aren't even going to have an open mind, I blame them. wyoAlmost no monkey people where I live! stinkydogbutt1912013-10-27 18:07:46almost none at all! woot!omaThe best part is watching OObama's base.... mygrane2013-10-27 18:07:13go flat fuckin broke, and they don't want to say anything about it. These fuckers are online daily trying to get more welfare to feed their family. Then they go outside, and say "Bush did it...cause he's a racist!" My only Dem renter, will be two month behind rent in 5 days. That's when I move to evict. And if they don't have the outrageous late fees, I wont even accept a payment. Go ahead...tell me about trickle down.I'm sorry he fucked your brain up so badly. § Carl_Spackler2013-10-27 18:07:03unk^ laughs at child and wife abuse. But no he isn' StealthLezzy2013-10-27 18:06:19t. I haven't seen him in nearly 20 years.sfoIt's education, I'm not the one hurting here § Cirque_du_GOP2013-10-27 18:02:49sfoI can't believe you trust those cunts. DSXmachina2013-10-27 18:01:47What the fuck is wrong with your brain?houno problem there............ bageled12013-10-27 17:59:52I love CaliunkI'll take my American Dream well-earned income jumpinjim2013-10-27 17:59:29here in Texas where it's worth 40% more than in NY and CA.sfoI thought you'd surpise us with something clever Wyne_E_DemoTyke2013-10-27 17:58:56Silly mesfoBetter than Switzerland or Luxembourg? DSXmachina2013-10-27 17:57:51I don't think so.ausyou guys wanna hear a joke emperordragoon2013-10-27 17:53:20"I'm proud to be an american, where at least i know im free....oh wait"unkSocial Mobility Much More Difficult in Red State lie_____detector2013-10-27 17:53:07Social Mobility Much More Difficult in Red States, Study Shows Conservatives love to give lip service to the American Dream. And to achieve it, they insist, all you need to do is work really hard. Who needs all those government programs, asked Marco Rubio, when the son of a bartender and KMart worker is a US Senator? But the reality is, today the United States lags far behind other advanced countries in social mobility. The "American Dream" is actually easier to achieve in Sweden. And the least likely place in America to move up the economic ladder? Yep, you guessed it: the Red States. Climbing the income ladder occurs less often in the Southeast and industrial Midwest, the data shows, with the odds notably low in Atlanta, Charlotte, Memphis, Raleigh, Indianapolis, Cincinnati and Columbus. By contrast, some of the highest rates occur in the Northeast, Great Plains and West, including in New York, Boston, Salt Lake City, Pittsburgh, Seattle and large swaths of California and Minnesota. This isn't surprising. We already knew the Red States are poorer, less educated, have higher rates of teen pregnancy, divorce and gun deaths. So, it makes sense that the American Dream is harder to come by there. But what I want to know is this: if right-wing economic policies are so superior, why does living in the Red States make it harder to achieve the American Dream conservatives love to idealize? sfoHolder:"I will investigate myself let you know!" AngrySatan2013-10-27 17:52:59"that will be $420M, thank you!"unkUnderstanding What Went Wrong in Benghazi NeutronBuddha2013-10-27 17:52:50Strafor Global Intelligence may be too much reading for cons, but I am posting a comprehensive article on Benghazi and the issues surrounding the incident. http://www.stratfor.com/analysis/understanding-what-went-wrong-benghaziunkTea Party's Obamacare Threat Could Harm GOP Elec lie_____detector2013-10-27 17:52:15Tea Party's Obamacare Threat Could Harm GOP Election Chances, Republicans Warn WASHINGTON -- Long-serving Republicans aren't engaged in an increasingly public smackdown of their tea party colleagues because they disagree with them -- it's more that they don't want a few hotheads to blow their party's best chance in years to retake control of the United States Senate. Several tea party-powered senators have laid down a gauntlet of late, saying the GOP should refuse to pass a bill to fund the government in September unless all funding for the implementation of the health care reform law is cut. It's a message -- championed by Sens. Mike Lee (R-Utah), Ted Cruz (R-Texas) and Marco Rubio (R-Fla.) -- that appeals to the enthusiasms of a population that united against Obamacare under the banner of Taxed Enough Already in 2009, a year in which federal taxes actually hit historic lows. But more senior members of the GOP caucus -- most prominently Sens. Tom Coburn (R-Okla.), John McCain (R-Ariz.) and Richard Burr (R-N.C.) -- have said they see the idea as ill-conceived and unreasonable. In an unexpected twist, the veteran lawmakers who are not exactly known for being voices of moderation are appealing for a more deliberate approach. Republican leaders said that while they believe the health care law will be the train wreck the GOP is forecasting, following the path of Cruz, Lee and Rubio could produce a more immediate derailment -- of the GOP's electoral chances in 2014. "I'm not sure why we should advocate for something that's absolutely impossible. The only way Obamacare is going to be repealed is with a 60-vote Republican Senate, and then, in order to override a presidential veto, I think it's 67 votes," McCain said. "I haven't seen an attempt to override a veto in a long time. It's a non-starter." And a political land mine, he added. "Those of us who have been around for a while know what happens when there's the threat of a shutdown of the government: It's the Congress that gets blamed," McCain said. "If the minority uses its strength, its 41 votes [to filibuster government funding], then clearly the American people will blame the Congress. And they do -- that's the history. And those who say that's not the case ignore the lessons of history and the realities of American politics."

This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://page2rss.com/337c1e41bac91a7c641d5c9b975f43a7/6748414_6748725/bey