inl

inlI like it. Are you a nigger? § JanetsNewHandle2014-01-25 15:43:41How many rounds fired under Bush? 2014-01-25 15:41:21As I recall...Bush was sending food aid. It turned ugly under CLINTION! How many shots fired under Clinton?sloExcept Ike. I like Ike. § DSXmachina2014-01-25 15:36:34sloI love this exercise, the cons show they know Jack_Burns2014-01-25 15:34:01nothing of the history of their country, the country they claim to revere. Beck's mild mea culpa will do little to undo commie__bastard2014-01-25 15:29:29the damage. And will Beck change his tune moving forward? No he won't. He has not. I listen to him. His show has replaced lib radio shows in SF, in fact there are none left in the Bay Area. Stephanie Miller, Norm Goldman, Mike Malloy, and Tom Hartman all taken off of local SF Bay Area AM stations. I think Randi Rhodes is lone survivor. sfoI know you are, but what am I? § KolobianKandidate2014-01-25 15:29:19Good but Wasted effort. No facts will deter Cons commie__bastard2014-01-25 15:26:33and Fox News news devotees and TParty types and Glen Beck-holes from tuning out to reality, distorting the news, and scapegoating others for their problems. We know that FOX and Glen Beck are the primary sources of lies. Proving it with hard evidence does nothing, unfortunately, to alter the landscape. The psychology of CONs and T Party types is such that they cannot be penetrated merely by means of facts and reason. I have no solutions to this dilemma. This is for the psychologists to tackle. This is for the mental health experts to fathom. We need to find other means of handling cons other than simply giving them facts, and disproving lies. It is a Brave New World. As the piece says, and proves by way of a credible study done at a major university, those who get no news at all are better informed than those on a steady diet of FOX News. phiI will see who runs against her DSXmachina2014-01-25 15:23:27in the primary.dalYour conjecture is illogical, it is not based on Jack_Burns2014-01-25 15:23:05any thing I posted.sfodid I mention FOX? § RedneckWasp2014-01-25 15:22:28sfoYour post reflects the thinking of a very Jack_Burns2014-01-25 15:22:03stupid person, I doubt you believe what you posted, although, being a conservative you might just be that stupidphiNo, that article is wrong, and here is why; Jack_Burns2014-01-25 15:17:45George Bush the 1st told Hussein that the major cities of Iraq would be nuked if he used chems. I reckon the Times of Israel is just another fulla shit rightwing rag.sfoHow exactly? I'll wait for your igvard2014-01-25 15:16:44answer w/links of course. phiI heard another lib shot up a mall today OCisstilldoomed2014-01-25 15:14:19in MD. what's the latest?sfoI'm so proud of our RaceBaiter in Chief Obie.... RedneckWasp2014-01-25 15:13:25he's single-handedly set back race relations decades.....balI am not being paid § 2014-01-25 15:08:58bakI prefer Bing, but you knew that § WHSENATEHOUSE2014-01-25 15:06:45sealol................... laditori2014-01-25 15:06:40'i don't understand how they're relevant to the issue' YOU JUST CAN'T MAKE THIS STUFF up!!!bakI did google it. No such claim exists. § honorbound682014-01-25 15:05:11bakI did. He's not a member of Congress. § honorbound682014-01-25 15:04:38seaI understand them just fine, thanks. Zaphod__Beeblebrox2014-01-25 15:04:37I just don't understand how they're relevant to the issue. PS You may want to actually read up on the subject: http://ift.tt/1f289tesucks you have to make shit up to feel like a beachbum900642014-01-25 15:02:59man, and even that is the failure that is your life..poor poor little shut in gerbil, blew your own leg off, I would be so ashamed I would kill myself, but then you are a con and have no shame lying is the only way you can get attention, sick fucking pervertseaWell I was thinking of investing money. Zaphod__Beeblebrox2014-01-25 15:00:18I could make $100k, but Capital Gains Taxes just went from 15% to 30% so my net gain went down from $85k to $70k. Its just not worth it anymore! THAT'S con logic for ya.seacharlatans and cranks President_Obama2014-01-25 14:58:07Douglas Holtz-Eakin, senior Staff Economist on GHWB's Council of Economic Advisers, chief economic policy adviser to McCain's 2008 campaign, became Director of the CBO in 2003. Under his leadership, the CBO undertook a study of tax rates, which found that any new revenue that tax cuts brought in paled in comparison with their cost. He then immediately "left" the CBO http://ift.tt/1f28c8C David Stockman was Reagan's first budget director and one of the original "true believers" and legendary architects of supply-side economics. here's what he said about claims that Reagan proved tax cuts lead to higher government revenues: "Reagan proved nothing of the kind and yet that became the mantra and it just led the Republican Party away from its traditional sound money, fiscal restraint." he also said: "This debt explosion has resulted not from big spending by the Democrats, but instead the Republican Party’s embrace, about three decades ago, of the insidious doctrine that deficits don’t matter if they result from tax cuts." Bush top economist Greg Mankiw: "I used the phrase "charlatans and cranks" in the first edition of my [best-selling economics] textbook to describe some of the economic advisers to Ronald Reagan, who told him that broad-based income tax cuts would have such large supply-side effects that the tax cuts would raise tax revenue. I did not find such a claim credible, based on the available evidence. I never have, and I still don't." Bush Economic Adviser Andrew Samwick: "You [in the Bush administration] are smart people. You know that the tax cuts have not fueled record revenues. You know what it takes to establish causality. You know that the first order effect of cutting taxes is to lower tax revenues. We all agree that the ultimate reduction in tax revenues can be less than this first order effect, because lower tax rates encourage greater economic activity and thus expand the tax base. No thoughtful person believes that this possible offset more than compensated for the first effect for these tax cuts. Not a single one."pocI also know that Bush cut taxes to the lowest Zaphod__Beeblebrox2014-01-25 14:53:55rates since the Depression and we had 5 years of fairly anemic growth followed by the worst recession since the great depression.pocI know that cutting taxes leads to lower Zaphod__Beeblebrox2014-01-25 14:53:02government revenues. The only possible exception is when tax rates are extremely high, slike over 90% marginal rates. I know that Laffer himself doesn't claim that the OP is always true.pocI don't believe Global Warming or WHSENATEHOUSE2014-01-25 14:49:57there is no GodpocLower tax rates still equate to higher tax WHSENATEHOUSE2014-01-25 14:48:21revenue. I am sorry if some of you still don't understand, but it will remain true.bakLOL. Can I have some of the drugs you're taking? § Zaphod__Beeblebrox2014-01-25 14:47:33a little butt hurt there eh chief...and I use beachbum900642014-01-25 14:44:34that word tongue in cheek

This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://ift.tt/1f289tt