What Jesus says about homosexuality is.... he

What Jesus says about homosexuality is.... he lie______detector2014-01-31 20:43:48What Jesus says about homosexuality is.... he doesn't mention it. He does however, have a lot to say about taking care of the Poor: Luke 6:20-21 Luke 6:20-21 Then he looked up at his disciples and said: 'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. 'Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 'Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. uke 4:16-19 Luke 4:16-19 When he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, he went to the synagogue on the sabbath day, as was his custom. He stood up to read, and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written: 'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. Matthew 25:34-36 Matthew 25:34-36 Then the king will say to those at his right hand, "Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me." Mark 10:21-22 Mark 10:21-22 Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions. uvaI don’t think you fags know what the word khandoor992014-01-31 20:43:28“ignore” means... fuckin’ faggots, no wonder they’re always used as the joke line in tv shows. "Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot agains lie______detector2014-01-31 20:43:21 "Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against democracy: Meet the “12 Percent Solution” I listened in to a recent conference call with conservative activists. Their latest scheme? Nullify laws they hate. What if there were a fourth branch of government that would allow the fans of “Duck Dynasty” to overturn Roe v. Wade, repeal Obamacare and pretty much nullify any federal law or Supreme Court decision they don’t like, based on the support of as little as 12 percent of the nation’s population? And what if that fourth branch already existed in the American constitutional order, just waiting to be properly realized? That’s basically the dream of conservative activist Charles Kacprowicz, as described in a recent conference call with supporters, effectively summing up many of the deepest hopes and fears of right-wing America in the post-Bush era. “The best that we have now is the idea of nullification. But the states right now do not have a provision in the Constitution that allows them to countermand laws,” Kacprowicz said. But he’s crafted a proposal that would change all that. “With this provision, in the Sovereignty and States Rights Amendment, they can countermand it, and they can disallow it when 30 states say ‘let’s stop.’ ” Naturally, Kacprowicz had a red meat example close at hand. “Obamacare right now has at least 26 states who have already filed lawsuits against the government for imposing on them the tax and the imposition of Obamacare on the states,” he continued. “That’s already going forward. So you have that right there. We need four more states and Obamacare is history. And so that’s the kind of power that this has in this sovereignty amendment.” Kacprowicz isn’t presently a leading player, but as this passage shows, he straddles two rising, radical state-level tendencies that the national media have woefully underreported so far: one an explosion of clearly unconstitutional “nullification” legislation, and the other a growing movement to call a constitutional convention (Kacprowicz prefers “amendment convention”) to pass a set of conservative dream amendments. Because he provides a uniquely crafted bridge between these two efforts, his ideas could prove significant in the near future. sdoDedicated to WoPo... (It's only 20 seconds) handlewaeshere2014-01-31 20:42:26LONG LIVE PUNK!! http://ift.tt/1fjdQmZ You stupid jerk! I can't take it no more! Your face makes me wanna puke! And your mothers a whore! AHHHHHHHHHHHHH You stupid jerk!unk‘Bette in Spokane’ For the last several months, lie______detector2014-01-31 20:42:04‘Bette in Spokane’ For the last several months, conservative opponents of the Affordable Care Act, including congressional Republicans, have encouraged Americans to contact the GOP with “Obamacare horror stories.” To that end, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the House Republican Conference chair, used her party’s official response to the State of the Union to highlight a woman in her home state who, she claimed, was better off before the law. “Not long ago, I got a letter from Bette in Spokane, who had hoped the president’s health care law would save her money, but found out instead her premiums were going up nearly $700 a month…. No, we shouldn’t go back to the way things were, but this law is not working.” Almost immediately, red flags went up among those who follow the health care debate closely. And for good reason: over the last several months, Republicans and their allies have put a spotlight on quite a few “Obamacare victims,” but the stories invariably fell apart after modest scrutiny. The local newspaper, the Spokeman-Review, tracked down Bette Grenier, who wrote the letter used in McMorris Rodgers’ remarks. [T]he “nearly $700 per month” increase in her premium that McMorris Rodgers cited in Tuesday night’s GOP response to the State of the Union address was based on one of the pricier options, a $1,200-a-month replacement plan that was pitched by Asuris Northwest to Grenier and her husband, Don. The carrier also offered a less expensive, $1,052-per-month option in lieu of their soon-to-be-discontinued catastrophic coverage plan. And, Grenier acknowledged the couple probably could have shaved another $100 a month off the replacement policy costs by purchasing them from the state’s online portal, the Health Plan Finder website, but they chose to avoid the government health exchanges. In a familiar situation, the horror story isn’t as horrible as we’d been led to believe. In this case, “Bette in Spokane” didn’t have a health care plan so much as she had insurance that covered catastrophic coverage – and nothing else – with a $10,000 deductible. In the official Republican Party’s SOTU response, all of these relevant details were ignored. Viewers were led to believe the law forced higher premiums on this consumer as part of some kind of inherent flaw in the system, but that’s not at all what happened in reality.I bet you're really popular witth the chicks livecartoondog2014-01-31 20:40:27trying to correct common slang termsunkRepublican plan: Audit rape victims, don't prote lie______detector2014-01-31 20:38:55Republican plan: Audit rape victims, don't protect pregnant workers Republicans must really, really want to distract voters from the economy, given how hard they're trying to change the subject to abortion, abortion, abortion, and also abortion. The March for Life is an annual event, which they're frantically trying to wring as much out of as they can. Then there's the proposed RNC resolution encouraging Republican candidates to talk about abortion more. Most of all, though, there's the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act. There are already sharp limits on anything that could be construed as government funding for abortion. But this bill takes it the next step: It would ban medical-expense tax deductions for abortion, allowing exceptions only for rape, incest, and protecting the woman's life. It's so extreme it could lead to rape victims being audited by the IRS to be sure they weren't getting a prohibited tax subsidy. During a male-dominated House committee hearing on the bill, Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler tried to substitute a bill that would really protect women's and fetal health: the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. But his effort was voted down, and: I am proud to announce that next week, the House will vote once and for all to end taxpayer funding for abortions. #MarchForLife — @GOPLeader That's right. Rather than passing a bill that would require employers to make reasonable accommodations to protect the health of pregnant women, Republicans are going to pass a bill (in the House, anyway) that would audit rape victims. They're going to focus on raising taxes on people who get medical care they don't like rather than protecting the jobs of pregnant women like the Walmart worker fired for carrying a water bottle or the hospital cleaner who was forced onto unpaid leave rather than being allowed a lifting restriction. Or the Albertsons worker whose baby was born prematurely and died after the mother's request—backed up by doctors' notes—for light duty was turned down and after she was told to keep working despite being in pain. For these women, Republicans have nothing, not even as the fig leaf preserving the notion that life and women's health are what motivates their latest anti-abortion push. I own a Cat 416 back hoe/loader § 2014-01-31 20:38:00pdxSo I think the california coast should let the livecartoondog2014-01-31 20:37:55central valley secede. Those cons will be an albatross for the next 200 years. http://ift.tt/1fjdQDj Researchers have documented multiple droughts in California that lasted 10 or 20 years in a row during the past 1,000 years. SAN JOSE, Calif. — California's current drought is being billed as the driest period in the state's recorded rainfall history. But scientists who study the West's long-term climate patterns say the state has been parched for much longer stretches before that 163-year historical period began. And they worry that the "megadroughts" typical of California's earlier history could come again. Related: California says it won't be able to fill water demand Through studies of tree rings, sediment and other natural evidence, researchers have documented multiple droughts in California that lasted 10 or 20 years in a row during the past 1,000 years — compared to the mere three-year duration of the current dry spell. The two most severe megadroughts make the Dust Bowl of the 1930s look tame: a 240-year-long drought that started in 850 and, 50 years after the conclusion of that one, another that stretched at least 180 years.pdxI have CAT stock... khandoor992014-01-31 20:36:07every time those fucks, Hamas act up I buy more.... unkI love the Crue Campbell_Soup2014-01-31 20:35:30http://ift.tt/1nyylBUpdxHey cons. Every been to the caterpillar factory? livecartoondog2014-01-31 20:33:35I have. Antilube sez: why do I care where little green multi-legged bugs come from. unkI am a rock n roller.....Sabbath Campbell_Soup2014-01-31 20:32:16http://ift.tt/1nyyo0wugh ibRightandLeft2014-01-31 20:31:06you occasionally miss the target. I think you did that on purpose.sdoWell I'm a punk rocker yes I am. handlewaeshere2014-01-31 20:30:55See me die on bleaker street, I'm bored with being god, See me sneering in my car, I'm driving to my star. I'm listening to the music with no fear, You can hear it too if you're sincere... http://ift.tt/1fjdQDuNational security reporting 'effectively being Anak_ni_Rico2014-01-31 20:21:15criminalized' under Obama. You libs must be so proud of your dictator. Abramson: National security reporting 'effectively being criminalized' under Obama New York Times executive editor Jill Abramson said Thursday that national security reporting is "effectively being criminalized" under President Obama, citing his administration's aggressive pursuit of whistleblowers. Speaking on a panel at Columbia University, Abramson said the crackdown "has had a profound effect on journalists who cover national security." “This seems to be, if not a stated policy, a reality where journalism about sensitive national security issues, that I see as vitality in the public interest, is effectively being criminalized, and a real freeze is setting in to what had been up to this point a healthy discourse between sources and journalists," she said. The Obama administration has overseen seven criminal leak investigations to date, more than every previous presidential administration combined. Abramson told Al Jazeera America earlier this month that Obama's White House is the "most secretive White House" she's covered during her tenure as a political journalist. "I would say it is the most secretive White House that I have ever been involved in covering, and that includes — I spent 22 years of my career in Washington and covered presidents from President Reagan on up through now, and I was Washington bureau chief of the Times during George W. Bush's first term," Abramson said.pdxsigh. I'm gonna miss the bulldog. § livecartoondog2014-01-31 20:17:14phi"Keith was playing 12-string and singing FROG-452014-01-31 20:16:05Mick Jagger (1995): "Keith was playing 12-string and singing harmonies into the same microphone as the 12-string. We recorded it in this tiny studio in the West End of London called Regent Sound, which was a demo studio. I think the whole of that album was recorded in there. But it's very different from doing those R&B covers or Marvin Gaye covers and all that. There's a definite feel about it. It's a very POP song, as opposed to all the blues covers and the Motown covers, which everyone did at the time."tpaI do and i am a liberal... § Three_Penny_Opera2014-01-31 20:13:26unkI did not know that Peter Gabriel teamed up Campbell_Soup2014-01-31 20:11:33with Sinead O'Conner. http://ift.tt/1nyylSDgrrOh, she did it alright and she will NOT go to guesswhatthatswhat2014-01-31 20:09:31jail! AMericans kick ass! I LOVE IT and libs whine!shut up, and i might let you live. § normal4you2014-01-31 20:08:14sfoDavid Duke reminds Americans Wolf Blitzer, RabEYE__ghett02014-01-31 20:06:07host of CNN's "Situation Room", 'was'(is) an AIPAC lobbyist, first and foremost. http://ift.tt/1nyyoO8 I mean, would it be fair to mention if a 'medical doctor' doing a show on cigs effect on health is an employee of a cig company??? PS-What is Wolf Blitzer's real(Jewish) name?grrI will do whatever I f*cking want for your sack tarmack222014-01-31 20:05:00Who buys that!!! GET REAL. If my mother said that, I would visit her less. TYRANT DICTATOR NUTJOB!!!!!!!!!!!sfoCons have apparently resolved to be "for rapturous2014-01-31 20:03:20something" as opposed to being opposed to everything. This brings us into the unknown, unknown realm of the "6 days, 6 weeks, I don't think 6 months" magical thinking.sfoI wonder if they will ever crack into China? § willwonka2014-01-31 20:02:22unkI think they are mostly retarded, seriously § willwonka2014-01-31 19:59:13sfoif kids are "going to bed hungry" in USA that is RabEYE__ghett02014-01-31 19:57:14not the fault of rich people or 'conservatives'. It is the POVERTY PIMPS flooding the nation with people so dumb and uncaring they can't use any of the massive 'food bank' programs. Shit, I got like 3 months worth of rice, beans and canned goods from some young college kid that he was getting from some Food Bank(and eating McDs instead, lol).unkWow....Cons really think that Peete Seeger Campbell_Soup2014-01-31 19:55:18was a fan of Hitler. Just when I thought I have heard everything. This is fucking amazing. Really?unkWhy would I want to listen to a fan of Hitler Anak_ni_Rico2014-01-31 19:51:27and Stalin?

This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://ift.tt/1nyyoxG