China is building coal-fired power plants, too

China is building coal-fired power plants, too DBagain12013-11-26 21:43:40I do SO love it when trained professionals struggle for YEARS and can't come up with the "obvious" solutions that idiots like you pull from your ass.sfoI don't have a store § The_Man2013-11-26 21:43:35lax★ Will you eat my feces if I provide 2013-11-26 21:42:23you the links to prove that?sforeality (which you ignore) is that Walmart is th W_The_Wonder_Duck2013-11-26 21:42:02largest retailer in the world which means people buy from them. as I said, you are dumber than I thoughtlax"The other day, CONS forced me to shop WalMart" DBagain12013-11-26 21:39:57 "I needed a DVD player and I WANTED to spend a lot of money on it, but because Cons keep my wages so low I was forced to shop at a store that supports slave labor in foreign countries" -- Another_Lib_Victim I don't care if it's profitable McLov1n2013-11-26 21:39:33It should be a facility that is provided. An alternative to cars and the TSA probing your ass to fly. sfoI'd rather pay less money for my cheap shit forposting2013-11-26 21:38:46than go to Macy's and spend too much money on cheap shit. sfowow, you are dumber than I thought. W_The_Wonder_Duck2013-11-26 21:37:43people want their cheap shit cheap, hence WalmartphiYou had me worried Anak_ni_Rico2013-11-26 21:34:46I thought someone had uploaded a video of me taking a shower.phiOK, what are the two words in Germany? trending2013-11-26 21:33:54I gave it a good go there.sfoThat's total fucking bullshit. forposting2013-11-26 21:33:21I grew up dirt poor, we cooked from scratch and grew up healthy and NOT FAT. NEVER ATE JUNK. hnlno, the caveman was FREE I tell you Jack_NWNJ2013-11-26 21:31:57ME THAG, ME FREE!!!!!!Must be a judge captured by car industry McLov1n2013-11-26 21:30:47I mean, how many more freeways can you build for cars run on $5 a gallon gas? Such a ridiculous proposition.nyc★ I don't understand what you're saying § 2013-11-26 21:30:36nycHussein: "I am fuckin' with China today!" AngrySatan2013-11-26 21:28:27"Just flew big bad bombers over the disputed territory!" hnluntil I perfect this time machine thingy § W_The_Wonder_Duck2013-11-26 21:28:15In other words, if the House and Senate are grid Pantheist_12013-11-26 21:28:05locked as they were on the eve of the shutdown, any motion from any member to end that gridlock should be allowed to proceed. Like, for example, a motion to vote on the Senate bill. That's how House Democrats read it. But the House Rules Committee voted the night of Sept. 30 to change that rule for this specific bill. They added language dictating that any motion "may be offered only by the majority Leader or his designee." So unless House Majority Leader Eric Cantor (R-VA) wanted the Senate spending bill to come to the floor, it wasn't going to happen. And it didn't. "I've never seen this rule used. I'm not even sure they were certain we would have found it," a House Democratic aide told TPM. "This was an overabundance of caution on their part. 'We've got to find every single crack in the dam that water can get through and plug it.'" Congressional historians agreed that it was highly unusual for the House to reserve such power solely for the leadership. "I've never heard of anything like that before," Norm Ornstein, resident scholar at the American Enterprise Institute, told TPM. "It is absolutely true that House rules tend to not have any explicit parliamentary rights guaranteed and narrowed to explicit party leaders," Sarah Binder, a congressional expert at the Brookings Institution, told TPM. "That's not typically how the rules are written." http://talkingpointsmemo.com/dc/the-house-gop-s-little-rule-change-that-guaranteed-a-shutdownsfoI don't see any skinny employees at walmart forposting2013-11-26 21:27:44EVER.. phi"Boots are made for walking, trending2013-11-26 21:27:15and that's just what I'll do... One of these days these boots are gonna walk all over you!"hnlI'd venture to say you call your farts roars. § forposting2013-11-26 21:26:42but, but... Dems never gerrymander! JohnnyTrigger2013-11-26 21:24:03Here is an analysis of 10 such egregiously gerrymandered districts. I was surprised to see that 9 of 10 were Dem districts. I would have figured Dems and Reps would have close to equal representation. I am sure there many other gerrymandered districts that favor GOP. http://www.nationaljournal.com/hotline/redistricting/modern-gerrymanders-10-most-contorted-congressional-districts-maps-20120330 FL-14 (D) IL-4 (D) IL-7 (D) MD-2 (D) MD-3 (D) NC-1 (D) NC-12 (D) OH-9 (D) PA-7 (R) TX-35 (D) hnlI am woman, hear me roar! § Incontinentia2013-11-26 21:23:06U.S. Postal Service Victimized by GOP Privatizat Pantheist_12013-11-26 21:22:45ion Scheme The massive operating deficits that have driven the U.S. Post Office to announce an end to delivery of First Class mail on Saturdays, beginning in August, are not the product of postal service ineptitude. Those deficits are not the product of increased public access to emails or from competition by private delivery services like UPS or FedEx. The U.S. Postal Service has been victimized by the Orwellian-labeled Postal Accountability and Enhancement Act of 2006 (PAEA), which embodies a scheme designed to destroy the constitutionally established U.S. Postal Service in order to privatize mail and parcel delivery. In a lame duck session, at the peak of the USPS' profitability and productivity, a then Republican-controlled Congress forced the U.S. Postal Service "to pre-fund 75 years worth of pensions" in the span of ten years, "a requirement not made of any other public or private institution." If not for the onerous and unprecedented requirements of the PAEA, the U.S. Postal Service, which is not funded by any taxes, would now be experiencing a $1.5 billion surplus. The contrived demise of the postal service must be understood within the broader subversive goals of libertarian and right wing philosophy --- a philosophy which, despite the express provisions of both the Preamble and Article I of the U.S. Constitution, rejects the right of government to "promote the general welfare"... http://www.bradblog.com/?p=9856sfo☁ ☸☻✿◑▣ Crazy_________Dude2013-11-26 21:21:41

beachcum90045 masturbates after he sees THIS scene

I am replying to you by making this post because you are either a stalker, a troll or a moron. There's a simple way to avoid being subjected to these kinds of posts: Simply do not respond to my posts in this forum. I assume no responsibility for any consequences resulting from this post. Thanks for your cooperation.

◑▣◉◐◙◆ 2013-11-26 21:21:00

Red States Poorer than Blue States

This is 2011 data from Wikipedia.

Notice that more blue states appear at the top of the table with lower poverty rates than at the bottom of the table where the red states show that their poverty rates are much higher than blue states. I manually compiled this in excel and had to post it here using a jpg file so you wouldn't have to run around looking for the data. It's OK to thank me now. Bye. hnlThere's a religious forum down the hall. Please Incontinentia2013-11-26 21:16:55get off my porch and I will use your Watchtower to start my BBQ.phiI'm just a soul whose intentions are good... ru_contented2013-11-26 21:16:13http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vstNm5xzuKM Oh lawd, please don't let me be misunderstood...corI want to say "Seems so!" but,we are under seige § PlayMisty2013-11-26 21:15:51The GOP's little rule change they hoped you woul Pantheist_12013-11-26 21:14:53dn't notice. House GOP made a rule change days before shutdown to make sure only Republicans could reopen the government. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0Jd-iaYLO1A&feature=sharehttp://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/10/13/house-republicans-rules-change_n_4095129.html During a floor speech on Saturday, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) drew attention to the quietly passed rule when he attempted to present a motion to accept the Senate's clean continuing resolution and reopen the government. Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), presiding over the chamber, told Van Hollen that the rule he was asking to use had been "altered" and he did not have the privilege of bringing that vote to the floor. In the ensuing back and forth, Chaffetz said the recently passed House Resolution 368 trumped the standing rules. Where any member of the House previously could have brought the clean resolution to the floor under House Rule 22, House Resolution 368 -- passed on the eve of the shutdown -- gave that right exclusively to the House majority leader, Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia. "The Rules Committee, under the rules of the House, changed the standing rules of the House to take away the right of any member to move to vote to open the government, and gave that right exclusively to the Republican Leader," said Van Hollen. "Is that right?" "The House adopted that resolution," replied Chaffetz. "I make my motion, Mr. Speaker," said Van Hollen. "I renew my motion that under the regular standing rules of the House... that the house take up the Senate amendments and open the government now." "Under section 2 of H.R. 368, that motion may be offered only by the majority leader or his designee," Chaffetz said. "Mr. Speaker, why were the rules rigged to keep the government shut down?" Van Hollen asked. "The gentleman will suspend," Chaffetz interjected. "Democracy has been suspended, Mr. Speaker."inlas honest as any other folks I know § 1Liberal_superman2013-11-26 21:14:08

This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://page2rss.com/337c1e41bac91a7c641d5c9b975f43a7/6791943_6792183/china-is-building-coal-fired-power-plants-too