cri

criThe zionist jew take over technique HardCoreNews2014-01-04 15:17:21WORLD CONQUEST THROUGH WORLD JEWISH GOVERNMENT Protocol I The Basic Doctrine Protocol II Economic Wars Protocol III Methods of Conquest Protocol IV Materialism Replaces Religion Protocol V Despotism and Modern Progress Protocol VI Take-Over Technique Protocol VII World-Wide Wars Protocol VIII Provisional Government Protocol IX Re-education Protocol X Preparing for Power Protocol XI The Totalitarian State Protocol XII Control of the Press Protocol XIII Distractions Protocol XIV Assault on Religion Protocol XV Ruthless Suppression Protocol XVI Brainwashing Protocol XVII Abuse of Authority Protocol XVIII Arrest of Opponents Protocol XIX Rulers and People Protocol XX Financial Programme Protocol XXI Loans and Credit Protocol XXII Power of Gold Protocol XXIII Instilling Obedience Protocol XXIV Qualities of the RulerI was just as surprised to learn that Phil was o-o-0-0-O-0-0-o-o2014-01-04 15:15:43a dumb racist as I was to learn he was an ignorant homophobe. And, I'm just as surprised to learn that he is a creepy pedophile as I was to learn he was a dumb racist. which is to say, not at all. he is, after all, a Christian conservative.defintion clearly equates as I stated..... examinerjohn2014-01-04 15:14:38sorry you and boyo are too stupid to realize it.haha think I'll go buy a new gun tomorrow § iceteabone2014-01-04 15:13:08I'm not, but the LIBS are!!!! LOL!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! § imafreeman2014-01-04 15:10:39houeither sign what i tell you to or else § buddascooter2014-01-04 15:09:26There are plenty of faggotn here bush. I'm mr_relaxation2014-01-04 15:08:43Just not ' in the mood'houI hadn’t heard that.... § khandoor992014-01-04 15:08:39Notice we now have a POTUS who decided It_does_not_matter2014-01-04 15:07:01which laws he will enforce. He announces this and no one calls him on it. How do you spell D I C T A T O R. What if he decides to no longer enforce "Right to Privacy Laws"? What if he decides to no longer use the "Innocent until proven guilty." concept? pdxuh huh o-o-0-0-O-0-0-o-o2014-01-04 15:06:54I totally believe you. no really. I totally do!pdxI mainly do it on a local basis-you'd be shocked § mr_relaxation2014-01-04 15:06:16pdxbell curve: science you can believe in khandoor992014-01-04 15:06:00prove it wrong and I’ll go away.If politics matter, I would think the choice is handlewaeshere2014-01-04 15:05:48easy... if not... I guess I would travel around the area for a while and find a spot I like. As someone who loves the mountains, if I were to retire in South America, I would be drawn to Argentina I would think...pdxFunny how I never saw a nigger in Rin Tin Tin § mr_relaxation2014-01-04 15:05:24houI think they prefer "Little Sisters of the Poor 2014-01-04 15:04:35of Ft. Leavenworth"pdxNeither. I just fuck libs over as a hobby § mr_relaxation2014-01-04 15:03:51sdoSo which one should I retire too? § It_does_not_matter2014-01-04 15:02:20pdx1932's King Kong--the most accurate depiction mr_relaxation2014-01-04 15:00:58of the true nigger condition I've ever seensdoFree market vs state control:a continent divided handlewaeshere2014-01-04 15:00:16There are two Latin Americas right now. The first is a bloc of countries—including Brazil, Argentina and Venezuela—that faces the Atlantic Ocean, mistrusts globalization and gives the state a large role in the economy. The second—made up of countries that face the Pacific such as Mexico, Peru, Chile and Colombia— embraces free trade and free markets. Because both sets of countries share similar geography, culture and history, this divide makes the continent today something of a controlled experiment in economics. For almost a decade, the economies of the Atlantic countries have grown more quickly, largely thanks to rising global commodity prices. But the years ahead look far better for the Pacific countries. The region as a whole thus faces a decision about (as it were) which way to face: to the Atlantic or the Pacific? There is good reason to think the Pacific-facing countries have the edge. Much of the continent is "paying the costs of exaggerated protectionism and…irresponsible policy," said Alan Garcia, Peru's former president, at a recent conference in Mexico City. "That is not the Latin America that I see in the future. I see the future in countries like Chile—which has been a good example of how to do things for a while—Colombia, Peru and Mexico." In 2014, the Pacific Alliance trade bloc (consisting of Mexico, Colombia, Peru and Chile) is slated to grow an average of 4.25%, boosted by high levels of foreign investment and low inflation, according to estimates from Morgan Stanley. But the Atlantic group of Venezuela, Brazil and Argentina—all linked in the Mercosur customs union—is projected to grow just 2.5%, with the region's heavyweight, Brazil, slated to grow a meager 1.9%. http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303370904579296352951436072I do have corrections to make to my statement. imafreeman2014-01-04 14:59:45Socialism, and therefore its cousin commienism, REQUIRE huge amounts of oppression and repression simply because the main socialist economy is fully owned and operated by the GVT which HAS to make severe restrictions on its society in a feeble attempt in making its impossible system operate. THAT is why socialism/commienism ALWAYS fails. Way too oppressive/repressive. thank you for point that out!!! LOL you dummass!!!!!!!!!sfoThatcher, "The Iron Lady", surrendered Britain OldeShtetlRa33i2014-01-04 14:59:32to bunch of nearly helpless turd worlders. UK went out with a whimper, not a bang. I can remember(barely) when England made better bicycles than the Japs.pdxhow much money loss in fixed assets pesky22014-01-04 14:55:07would an American coup cause? I think the total loss in value of American companies and real estate would be about $50 trillion.I have read it myself. So stop lying § coldhands2014-01-04 14:55:04I read that he lives in a house, but that was o-o-0-0-O-0-0-o-o2014-01-04 14:54:05debunked. just don't ask how, ok?inlYou do it, I gave you a link below, lazy Bagger § bushworstever2014-01-04 14:53:48pdxhey twat-face pesky22014-01-04 14:53:35read what I post and comment on it if you like, but don't paraphrase it wrong as if that was some kind of argument or something.inlI did google it. No such claim exists. § honorbound682014-01-04 14:53:16wyoI think you're a dippy cuckoo bird § pesky22014-01-04 14:52:22wyoI think elements in our military are going to stinkydogbutt2082014-01-04 14:51:20deal with "The Obama problem" very soonpdxself-hating public assistance recipients pesky22014-01-04 14:51:08Ladies and Gentlemen, meet the base of your Republican Party: "I don't have any use for the federal government," Rupe said, even though his household's $13,000 yearly income comes exclusively from Washington. "It's a bunch of liars, crooks, and thieves, and they've never done anything for me. I'm not ungrateful, but I don't have much faith in this health care law. Do I think it's going to work? No. Do I think it's going to bankrupt the country? Yes." Rupe sounds like he could be standing on a soapbox at a tea-party rally, but he happens to be sitting in a back room at the Family Health Centers' largest clinic in Louisville—signing up for Medicaid. Rupe, who is white, insists that illegal immigrants from Mexico and Africa get more government assistance than he does. (Illegal immigrants do not, in fact, qualify for Medicaid or coverage under the Affordable Care Act.) ... "President Obama's idea is taking from the working people to give to the people who won't take care of themselves. It's redistribution of wealth," Rupe said. "I've always taken care of myself. You got these young girls who go out and get pregnant and then they get $1,500 a month for having a kid, so they have two."

This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://page2rss.com/337c1e41bac91a7c641d5c9b975f43a7/6847710_6847957/cri