Thursday, 6 March 2014

Again name me a lie

Again name me a lie gorags2014-03-06 03:20:31we should be able to find out something. You have all of this advanced knowledge to say all or almost all of Fox's reporting is made up where do you find the facts to back up that. I loved the comment about taking something out of my ass you know how to excite a guy this early in the morning.How to Determine If Your Religious Liberty Is Be lie______detector2014-03-06 03:15:42How to Determine If Your Religious Liberty Is Being Threatened... 1. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to go to a religious service of my own choosing. B) Others are allowed to go to religious services of their own choosing. 2. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to marry the person I love legally, even though my religious community blesses my marriage. B) Some states refuse to enforce my own particular religious beliefs on marriage on those two guys in line down at the courthouse. 3. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am being forced to use birth control. B) I am unable to force others to not use birth control. 4. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to pray privately. B) I am not allowed to force others to pray the prayers of my faith publicly. 5. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) Being a member of my faith means that I can be bullied without legal recourse. B) I am no longer allowed to use my faith to bully gay kids with impunity. 6. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to purchase, read or possess religious books or material. B) Others are allowed to have access books, movies and websites that I do not like. 7. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) My religious group is not allowed equal protection under the establishment clause. B) My religious group is not allowed to use public funds, buildings and resources as we would like, for whatever purposes we might like. Scoring key: If you answered "A" to any question, then perhaps your religious liberty is indeed at stake. But just remember this one little, constitutional, concept: this means you can fight for your equality -- not your superiority. If you answered "B" to any question, then not only is your religious liberty not at stake, but there is a strong chance that you are oppressing the religious liberties of others. This is the point where I would invite you to refer back to the tenets of your faith, especially the ones about your neighbors. pubD'oHbama signs 2 year delay in Obamacare, Gee neverez2014-03-06 03:10:09I wonder why the individual mandate kicks in after the election? Talking about a GOP campaign gift. 2/3 of the country think Obamacare is a bad idea. What Jesus says about homosexuality is.... he lie______detector2014-03-06 03:03:37What Jesus says about homosexuality is.... he doesn't mention it. He does however, have a lot to say about taking care of the Poor: Luke 6:20-21 Luke 6:20-21 Then he looked up at his disciples and said: 'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. 'Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 'Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. uke 4:16-19 Luke 4:16-19 When he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, he went to the synagogue on the sabbath day, as was his custom. He stood up to read, and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written: 'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. Matthew 25:34-36 Matthew 25:34-36 Then the king will say to those at his right hand, "Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me." Mark 10:21-22 Mark 10:21-22 Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions. "Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against lie______detector2014-03-06 03:02:48"Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against democracy: Meet the “12 Percent Solution” I listened in to a recent conference call with conservative activists. Their latest scheme? Nullify laws they hate. What if there were a fourth branch of government that would allow the fans of “Duck Dynasty” to overturn Roe v. Wade, repeal Obamacare and pretty much nullify any federal law or Supreme Court decision they don’t like, based on the support of as little as 12 percent of the nation’s population? And what if that fourth branch already existed in the American constitutional order, just waiting to be properly realized? That’s basically the dream of conservative activist Charles Kacprowicz, as described in a recent conference call with supporters, effectively summing up many of the deepest hopes and fears of right-wing America in the post-Bush era. “The best that we have now is the idea of nullification. But the states right now do not have a provision in the Constitution that allows them to countermand laws,” Kacprowicz said. But he’s crafted a proposal that would change all that. “With this provision, in the Sovereignty and States Rights Amendment, they can countermand it, and they can disallow it when 30 states say ‘let’s stop.’ ” Naturally, Kacprowicz had a red meat example close at hand. “Obamacare right now has at least 26 states who have already filed lawsuits against the government for imposing on them the tax and the imposition of Obamacare on the states,” he continued. “That’s already going forward. So you have that right there. We need four more states and Obamacare is history. And so that’s the kind of power that this has in this sovereignty amendment.” Kacprowicz isn’t presently a leading player, but as this passage shows, he straddles two rising, radical state-level tendencies that the national media have woefully underreported so far: one an explosion of clearly unconstitutional “nullification” legislation, and the other a growing movement to call a constitutional convention (Kacprowicz prefers “amendment convention”) to pass a set of conservative dream amendments. Because he provides a uniquely crafted bridge between these two efforts, his ideas could prove significant in the near future. ‘Bette in Spokane’ For the last several months, lie______detector2014-03-06 03:02:06‘Bette in Spokane’ For the last several months, conservative opponents of the Affordable Care Act, including congressional Republicans, have encouraged Americans to contact the GOP with “Obamacare horror stories.” To that end, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the House Republican Conference chair, used her party’s official response to the State of the Union to highlight a woman in her home state who, she claimed, was better off before the law. “Not long ago, I got a letter from Bette in Spokane, who had hoped the president’s health care law would save her money, but found out instead her premiums were going up nearly $700 a month…. No, we shouldn’t go back to the way things were, but this law is not working.” Almost immediately, red flags went up among those who follow the health care debate closely. And for good reason: over the last several months, Republicans and their allies have put a spotlight on quite a few “Obamacare victims,” but the stories invariably fell apart after modest scrutiny. The local newspaper, the Spokeman-Review, tracked down Bette Grenier, who wrote the letter used in McMorris Rodgers’ remarks. [T]he “nearly $700 per month” increase in her premium that McMorris Rodgers cited in Tuesday night’s GOP response to the State of the Union address was based on one of the pricier options, a $1,200-a-month replacement plan that was pitched by Asuris Northwest to Grenier and her husband, Don. The carrier also offered a less expensive, $1,052-per-month option in lieu of their soon-to-be-discontinued catastrophic coverage plan. And, Grenier acknowledged the couple probably could have shaved another $100 a month off the replacement policy costs by purchasing them from the state’s online portal, the Health Plan Finder website, but they chose to avoid the government health exchanges. In a familiar situation, the horror story isn’t as horrible as we’d been led to believe. In this case, “Bette in Spokane” didn’t have a health care plan so much as she had insurance that covered catastrophic coverage – and nothing else – with a $10,000 deductible. In the official Republican Party’s SOTU response, all of these relevant details were ignored. Viewers were led to believe the law forced higher premiums on this consumer as part of some kind of inherent flaw in the system, but that’s not at all what happened in reality. hnlWhy do liberals think they can Pick CaptainZ19192014-03-06 02:18:57and chose Which laws they wanna obey in this country we need to show them. They must Obey all laws I am talking about the IRS hearings right now !!I found the missing link. Swear to God. No lie 2014-03-06 01:20:21trust meLOL I'll take a link to the CBS program § 2014-03-06 00:56:16Package deals suck, I'm never happy with 2014-03-06 00:55:41either cause I always want to see what's on the other one. HBO does have newer movies though & better seriesOh, that - first and only time I've ever 2014-03-06 00:55:00tried anything like that. But the show was available on TV in order, so we could get them all on the DVR in a series and we hadn't seen any and the hype was so strong we wanted to see it before we heard too many details in the media so we went for it. And it was an ordeal but really engaging. I wouldn't do it often, but it is an adventure that is hard to judge until you've tried it. It was really cool to not have to wait a week to get the answers, we could watch as much as we wanted at once and it was good enough we kept wanting to see the next.!! RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:54:36"doing it wrong"? I watched every X-Files too< soup_to_nuts >03/06 00:51:43 It was good... http://ift.tt/1l5glwANow see, I can talk about the X-Files all night. RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:53:27Most people don't even realize there was a timeline.We axed showtime. I got showtime mainly for 2014-03-06 00:52:52Weeds. HBO has Realtime With Bill Maher and True Detective, and I'm not into Dexter on Showtime, so I cut showtime and kept hbo.unkI mean trying to sit down and watch RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:52:35an entire 12 hour arc at once. Do you even have SEX for 12 hours at a time?unk"doing it wrong"? I watched every X-Files too soup_to_nuts2014-03-06 00:51:43It was good, but so is some of the newer stuff. Lost got lost though. The ending lost it. Then they lost meI have no need or desire for your validation. RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:50:30lnk Be far less lame, loser lib. § < TheZionazis > 2014-02-14 14:53:08 unk Be far less lame. § < TheZionazis > 2014-02-13 21:30:53 wic Be far less lame. § < TheZionazis > 2014-02-07 11:23:51 stl Be far less lame. § < TheZionazis > 2014-02-07 07:43:10 inl Be far less lame, loser lib. § < TheZionazis > 2014-02-04 08:20:03 spk Be far less lame, loser lib. § < TheZionazis > 2014-02-02 12:16:25unkThat's what I want but we have showtime of cours 2014-03-06 00:49:55have to change it, unkYou're kind of doing it wrong, if you don't mind RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:49:13me saying so. My favorite TV show ever was The X-Files, and mainly because it was like picking up a good book every week and reading for an hour. Someday, someone will gather up those reruns and show them in order and people will get it. Again. Fuckin thing was a masterpiece. No comparison. Hell, I don't even listen to the Beatles for hours and hours.Be far less lame BestPoster2014-03-06 00:47:55and I'll excuse your behaviorunkthey know everything about everything else too RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:45:47the weird part is that they were born knowing everything they'd ever need to know until the die. Now, may I tell you how offensive it is to me that you continue to call them "cons" when they have nothing to do with conservatism?unkSpacey is good, and it is more of a drama soup_to_nuts2014-03-06 00:45:27than just Washington, I mean it's good, but it's hard to find the will to sit through and watch a whole season. I found it good, but not good enough to do that. If you get HBO check out True Detective with Harrelson and McConaughey Riveting and the acting starts out good and gets better and better. Really good. Blacklist is good too for sure but not as good as True Detective. unkWanna see something funny RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:44:39go to CBS.com and watch "Mom" from the beginning. If you aren't addicted by the menopause episode, I bow to your superiority.unkSee, I gave Breaking Bad 3 episodes RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:43:10but I got tired of 4 minutes of show and five minutes of commercials about shows coming up on AMC and 4 minutes of show and five minutes of commercials about shows coming up on AMC and 4 minutes of show and five minutes of commercials about shows coming up on AMC and 4 minutes of show and five minutes of commercials about shows coming up on AMC and 4 minutes of show and five minutes of commercials about shows coming up on AMC and 4 minutes of show and five minutes of commercials about shows coming up on AMC and 4 minutes of show and five minutes of commercials about shows coming up on AMC.unkI thought Black Sails might be good but 2014-03-06 00:42:50eh, I think I will be bored with more info about DC. unkWife and I watched 3 or 4 and got bored soup_to_nuts2014-03-06 00:41:06Nothing like the wildly acclaimed series about the meth cooks. Blacklist is a great series on TV right now.yep. I admit it. you are dead on 100% correct. RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:40:32Were you expecting an argument?unkLOL I heard there are 3 incidents of car theft 2014-03-06 00:40:21well read itunkDarn I was afraid of that, Got to start watching Truth-buster2014-03-06 00:39:25apparently it's all they do on the hill now, worthless fucking congress & senateunklol soup opera RaphaelHythloday2014-03-06 00:38:29I haven't seen it, but sources tell me it's really intense and not like regualar TV at all.



This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://ift.tt/1l5gm3B

No comments:

Post a Comment