corporation?

corporation? AngrySatan2014-03-16 23:48:23I think you own a small business and you are looking at mutual benefit. Corporations have far less noble goalsphxOh good grief. 2014-03-16 23:47:58Believe me, I was all Ayn Randy and an antiestablishment "anarchist", too, when I was 27. I thought I was sooooo smart. Then I grew up, assessed more evidence, lived in the real world, and concluded that we have it pretty good, despite shortcomings and failures. The goal is to recognize and address failures and shortcomings, not to completely dismantle thousands of years of civilization and historical inertia so libertarians can try out their social engineering hypotheses.sdoJT you never fail to amaze me with you naivete. livecartoondog2014-03-16 23:47:57I don't like anyone having it, gov or corp, but I'd rather have the gov have it than some corp. For example, Target showed how much they care about your data. I don't think that was an exception. phxI've asked for proof like that a thousand theanti-lib372014-03-16 23:46:57times. Not once has a lib had ANY! sdoI own a business. JohnnyTrigger2014-03-16 23:46:51that's how I behave. I am looking to help my customers.phxI know, libertarians believe that it is wrong I_Like_Taxes2014-03-16 23:46:33that we implemented child labor laws and make children get an education. After all, they should be "free" to work 80-hour days in a factory for peanuts, instead of getting an education, whether public, private, or home-schooled. You hatred for economics speaks volumes. phxSure I have. Why lie? § coldhands2014-03-16 23:45:41phxOH one of THOSE huh? Prove I am not what I coldhands2014-03-16 23:45:09claim.phxWhy don't you stop being such a whiny little I_Like_Taxes2014-03-16 23:44:18victim and break free from the state and go build your own Galt's Gulch? I forgot, Libertarians get their nutrition from bitching and moaning at things like Social Security, the Civil Rights Act, reduced school lunch programs, and public education. They are simply not brave enough to live in a world of "freedom". phxI don't take kindly to wannabe tribesmen. § Ti-Block2014-03-16 23:43:51phxWell I can do that. YOU don't accept the coldhands2014-03-16 23:43:05Scientific Economic theories of the great JM Keynesphxyou have to do better than that lib; I've Unruh2014-03-16 23:41:06already been called worse than that here tonight.phxI disagree with coercive education Truedizzle2014-03-16 23:40:58But I'd like an example of my "hatred of science..."phxI agree fundumentally with your position; what Unruh2014-03-16 23:37:33is your alternative? Home schooling; religious schools, etc. True the govt. run schools are little more than LW indoctrination centers and funding vehicles for the LW teachers unions.phxSo something's intrinsically wrong with gov't? 2014-03-16 23:36:36Oh, the idiocy. The knee-jerkishness. In school, I learned a lot of things. But I didn't learn to worship government. Your actual propaganda is as disgraceful as that which you imagine and accuse our schools of.phxAnother reason I'm not a right winger. § Truedizzle2014-03-16 23:36:10phxI took an Oath . Not a pledge § coldhands2014-03-16 23:35:59phxYou're such a free thinker! 2014-03-16 23:32:31I can tell by the way almost everything you say comes directly from Lew Rockwell.sacsure; you post like a real moderate; never Unruh2014-03-16 23:25:08doubted it for a minute. I'd respect you libs just a little-some of you anyway-if you were more honest.sacI'm pretty moderate, actually 2014-03-16 23:20:25The fact that someone doesn't automatically support the extremist t'party agenda doesn't necessarily mean they're "liberal". Nor does disagreeing with someone who thinks of himself as "conservative". Today's "conservatives" would reject Reagan in a heartbeat because he'd be too "liberal" for them. They'd call him a "RINO". They're not conservative anymore, they're just plain crazy.sacNope. You want to see the Mines. Come see them coldhands2014-03-16 23:14:17I will be down in Kingman in 10 days. We will arrange it...^WTF? noRONPAULogies2014-03-16 23:12:21sfo Bush Vs Gore I wrote in Geronimo § < coldhands > 2014-03-04 12:48:22 What was your first clue, the way he spelled DookieHauser2014-03-16 23:12:15S Y P H I L I S ?sac2016 Teaparty Candidate not doing well cheesus-saves2014-03-16 23:11:51TOPEKA, Kan. (AP) — The Rev. Fred Phelps Sr., who founded a Kansas church widely known for its protests at military funerals and anti-gay sentiments, is in a care facility, according to a church spokesman. Related Stories Founder of Westboro church in Kansas excommunicated, on death bed: son Reuters Fred Phelps, founder of 'rabid' Westboro Baptist Church, said near death Christian Science Monitor Westboro Baptist Church's Founder Is Dying, Excommunicated The Atlantic Wire 'God Will Be There for Us' The Wall Street Journal [$$] 'God Will Be There for Us' The Wall Street Journal Phelps, 84, is being cared for in a Shawnee County facility, Westboro Baptist Church spokesman Steve Drain said Sunday. Drain wouldn't identify the facility. "I can tell you that Fred Phelps is having some health problems," Drain said. "He's an old man, and old people get health problems." Members of the Westboro church, based in Topeka, frequently protest at funerals of soldiers with signs containing messages such as "Thank God for dead soldiers," and "Thank God for 9/11," claiming the deaths are God's punishment for American immorality and tolerance of homosexuality and abortion.I won't repeat my post below but it certainly Unruh2014-03-16 23:10:32applies here as well.sacI see the fear in YOU being called out. § noRONPAULogies2014-03-16 23:09:43I'm not a fool, and can spot a c0n IMP § noRONPAULogies2014-03-16 23:09:17phxAnd more I_Like_Taxes2014-03-16 23:08:33Yet in interviews with reason, a half-dozen longtime libertarian activists—including some still close to Paul—all named the same man as Paul's chief ghostwriter: Ludwig von Mises Institute founder Llewellyn Rockwell, Jr. But a source close to the Paul presidential campaign told reason that Rockwell authored much of the content of the Political Report and Survival Report. "If Rockwell had any honor he'd come out and I say, ‘I wrote this stuff,'" said the source, who asked not to be named because Paul remains friendly with Rockwell and is reluctant to assign responsibility for the letters. "He should have done it 10 years ago." Rockwell was publicly named as Paul's ghostwriter as far back as a 1988 issue of the now-defunct movement monthly American Libertarian. "This was based on my understanding at the time that Lew would write things that appeared in Ron's various newsletters," former AL editor Mike Holmes told reason. "Neither Ron nor Lew ever told me that, but other people close to them such as Murray Rothbard suggested that Lew was involved, and it was a common belief in libertarian circles." http://ift.tt/1kNliKs☛ I am not racist, but I hate white people § Crazy________Dude2014-03-16 23:08:29phxJust because you say so? I_Like_Taxes2014-03-16 23:05:31Mr Rockwell denied authorship to Jamie Kirchick, the reporter whose New Republic article published earlier this week reignited controversy over the newsletters. But both Mr Rockwell (who attacked the New Republic article on his site) and Mr Tucker refused to discuss the matter with Democracy in America. ("Look at Mises.org," Mr Tucker told me, "I'm willing to take any responsibility for anything up there, OK?") According to Wirkman Virkkala, formerly the managing editor of the libertarian monthly Liberty, the racist and survivalist elements that appeared in the newsletter were part of a deliberate "paleolibertarian" strategy, "a last gasp effort to try class hatred after the miserable showing of Ron Paul’s 1988 presidential effort." It is impossible now to prove individual authorship of any particular item in the newsletter, but it is equally impossible to believe that Mr Rockwell did not know of and approve what was going into the newsletter. http://ift.tt/NmlvbA

This post has been generated by Page2RSS



via forums - craigslist http://ift.tt/NmlvbD