How to Determine If Your Religious Liberty Is Be lie______detector2014-03-07 04:15:15How to Determine If Your Religious Liberty Is Being Threatened... 1. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to go to a religious service of my own choosing. B) Others are allowed to go to religious services of their own choosing. 2. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to marry the person I love legally, even though my religious community blesses my marriage. B) Some states refuse to enforce my own particular religious beliefs on marriage on those two guys in line down at the courthouse. 3. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am being forced to use birth control. B) I am unable to force others to not use birth control. 4. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to pray privately. B) I am not allowed to force others to pray the prayers of my faith publicly. 5. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) Being a member of my faith means that I can be bullied without legal recourse. B) I am no longer allowed to use my faith to bully gay kids with impunity. 6. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) I am not allowed to purchase, read or possess religious books or material. B) Others are allowed to have access books, movies and websites that I do not like. 7. My religious liberty is at risk because: A) My religious group is not allowed equal protection under the establishment clause. B) My religious group is not allowed to use public funds, buildings and resources as we would like, for whatever purposes we might like. Scoring key: If you answered "A" to any question, then perhaps your religious liberty is indeed at stake. But just remember this one little, constitutional, concept: this means you can fight for your equality -- not your superiority. If you answered "B" to any question, then not only is your religious liberty not at stake, but there is a strong chance that you are oppressing the religious liberties of others. This is the point where I would invite you to refer back to the tenets of your faith, especially the ones about your neighbors. unkWhat Jesus says about homosexuality is.... he lie______detector2014-03-07 04:09:40What Jesus says about homosexuality is.... he doesn't mention it. He does however, have a lot to say about taking care of the Poor: Luke 6:20-21 Luke 6:20-21 Then he looked up at his disciples and said: 'Blessed are you who are poor, for yours is the kingdom of God. 'Blessed are you who are hungry now, for you will be filled. 'Blessed are you who weep now, for you will laugh. uke 4:16-19 Luke 4:16-19 When he came to Nazareth, where he had been brought up, he went to the synagogue on the sabbath day, as was his custom. He stood up to read, and the scroll of the prophet Isaiah was given to him. He unrolled the scroll and found the place where it was written: 'The Spirit of the Lord is upon me, because he has anointed me to bring good news to the poor. Matthew 25:34-36 Matthew 25:34-36 Then the king will say to those at his right hand, "Come, you that are blessed by my Father, inherit the kingdom prepared for you from the foundation of the world; for I was hungry and you gave me food, I was thirsty and you gave me something to drink, I was a stranger and you welcomed me, I was naked and you gave me clothing, I was sick and you took care of me, I was in prison and you visited me." Mark 10:21-22 Mark 10:21-22 Jesus, looking at him, loved him and said, "You lack one thing; go, sell what you own, and give the money to the poor, and you will have treasure in heaven; then come, follow me." When he heard this, he was shocked and went away grieving, for he had many possessions. unk"Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against lie______detector2014-03-07 04:08:06"Tea Party hatches quiet-but-insane plot against democracy: Meet the “12 Percent Solution” I listened in to a recent conference call with conservative activists. Their latest scheme? Nullify laws they hate. What if there were a fourth branch of government that would allow the fans of “Duck Dynasty” to overturn Roe v. Wade, repeal Obamacare and pretty much nullify any federal law or Supreme Court decision they don’t like, based on the support of as little as 12 percent of the nation’s population? And what if that fourth branch already existed in the American constitutional order, just waiting to be properly realized? That’s basically the dream of conservative activist Charles Kacprowicz, as described in a recent conference call with supporters, effectively summing up many of the deepest hopes and fears of right-wing America in the post-Bush era. “The best that we have now is the idea of nullification. But the states right now do not have a provision in the Constitution that allows them to countermand laws,” Kacprowicz said. But he’s crafted a proposal that would change all that. “With this provision, in the Sovereignty and States Rights Amendment, they can countermand it, and they can disallow it when 30 states say ‘let’s stop.’ ” Naturally, Kacprowicz had a red meat example close at hand. “Obamacare right now has at least 26 states who have already filed lawsuits against the government for imposing on them the tax and the imposition of Obamacare on the states,” he continued. “That’s already going forward. So you have that right there. We need four more states and Obamacare is history. And so that’s the kind of power that this has in this sovereignty amendment.” Kacprowicz isn’t presently a leading player, but as this passage shows, he straddles two rising, radical state-level tendencies that the national media have woefully underreported so far: one an explosion of clearly unconstitutional “nullification” legislation, and the other a growing movement to call a constitutional convention (Kacprowicz prefers “amendment convention”) to pass a set of conservative dream amendments. Because he provides a uniquely crafted bridge between these two efforts, his ideas could prove significant in the near future. unk ‘Bette in Spokane’ For the last several months lie______detector2014-03-07 04:04:38 ‘Bette in Spokane’ For the last several months, conservative opponents of the Affordable Care Act, including congressional Republicans, have encouraged Americans to contact the GOP with “Obamacare horror stories.” To that end, Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers (R-Wash.), the House Republican Conference chair, used her party’s official response to the State of the Union to highlight a woman in her home state who, she claimed, was better off before the law. “Not long ago, I got a letter from Bette in Spokane, who had hoped the president’s health care law would save her money, but found out instead her premiums were going up nearly $700 a month…. No, we shouldn’t go back to the way things were, but this law is not working.” Almost immediately, red flags went up among those who follow the health care debate closely. And for good reason: over the last several months, Republicans and their allies have put a spotlight on quite a few “Obamacare victims,” but the stories invariably fell apart after modest scrutiny. The local newspaper, the Spokeman-Review, tracked down Bette Grenier, who wrote the letter used in McMorris Rodgers’ remarks. [T]he “nearly $700 per month” increase in her premium that McMorris Rodgers cited in Tuesday night’s GOP response to the State of the Union address was based on one of the pricier options, a $1,200-a-month replacement plan that was pitched by Asuris Northwest to Grenier and her husband, Don. The carrier also offered a less expensive, $1,052-per-month option in lieu of their soon-to-be-discontinued catastrophic coverage plan. And, Grenier acknowledged the couple probably could have shaved another $100 a month off the replacement policy costs by purchasing them from the state’s online portal, the Health Plan Finder website, but they chose to avoid the government health exchanges. In a familiar situation, the horror story isn’t as horrible as we’d been led to believe. In this case, “Bette in Spokane” didn’t have a health care plan so much as she had insurance that covered catastrophic coverage – and nothing else – with a $10,000 deductible. In the official Republican Party’s SOTU response, all of these relevant details were ignored. Viewers were led to believe the law forced higher premiums on this consumer as part of some kind of inherent flaw in the system, but that’s not at all what happened in reality. sac$54241 each MUST READ dwags2014-03-07 04:04:29THINKING OUT LOUD Been a lot of talk about the massive 17 trillion dollar debt that's been amassed by the Federal Govt. That amounts to $54241 per each and every citizen of the United States and that ain't hayfeed. To put things into perspective, $17,000,000,000,000 (that's 17 trillion) will buy 27 million high end Cadillac Escalades, 26 billion 60" plasma tv's, over 850 million high end Indian motorcycles, and lastly, our debt could buy just over 198 cities of Boston, Mass. The government downplaying the situation and trying to razzle-dazzle us into thinking that it's no big deal. But you know something? It is a big deal. If $54,241 per citizen isn't a big deal, then i don't know what a big debt deal is. Thanks for reading and we need to put some serious, thought into next years election.unkRepublican plan: Audit rape victims, don't prote lie______detector2014-03-07 03:59:34Republican plan: Audit rape victims, don't protect pregnant workers Republicans must really, really want to distract voters from the economy, given how hard they're trying to change the subject to abortion, abortion, abortion, and also abortion. The March for Life is an annual event, which they're frantically trying to wring as much out of as they can. Then there's the proposed RNC resolution encouraging Republican candidates to talk about abortion more. Most of all, though, there's the No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act. There are already sharp limits on anything that could be construed as government funding for abortion. But this bill takes it the next step: It would ban medical-expense tax deductions for abortion, allowing exceptions only for rape, incest, and protecting the woman's life. It's so extreme it could lead to rape victims being audited by the IRS to be sure they weren't getting a prohibited tax subsidy. During a male-dominated House committee hearing on the bill, Democratic Rep. Jerry Nadler tried to substitute a bill that would really protect women's and fetal health: the Pregnant Workers Fairness Act. But his effort was voted down, and: I am proud to announce that next week, the House will vote once and for all to end taxpayer funding for abortions. #MarchForLife — @GOPLeader That's right. Rather than passing a bill that would require employers to make reasonable accommodations to protect the health of pregnant women, Republicans are going to pass a bill (in the House, anyway) that would audit rape victims. They're going to focus on raising taxes on people who get medical care they don't like rather than protecting the jobs of pregnant women like the Walmart worker fired for carrying a water bottle or the hospital cleaner who was forced onto unpaid leave rather than being allowed a lifting restriction. Or the Albertsons worker whose baby was born prematurely and died after the mother's request—backed up by doctors' notes—for light duty was turned down and after she was told to keep working despite being in pain. For these women, Republicans have nothing, not even as the fig leaf preserving the notion that life and women's health are what motivates their latest anti-abortion push. chawaiting for your reply..to 2 questions I asked § Humpty-was-pushed2014-03-07 03:58:56chaI am not the one whining... lol § libandproudd2014-03-07 03:58:46lvghow are the Tea Party 'Bigots'..I'll wait, again § Humpty-was-pushed2014-03-07 03:54:48lvghow so?..I'll wait for a response § Humpty-was-pushed2014-03-07 03:53:46fsmThe main reason the US students are gorags2014-03-07 03:53:39 getting more behind against the rest of the world is because the family unit is falling apart in the country. Where I live we have the backpack program they send non perishable food home with little kids over the weekend because so many kids are coming to school hungry on Monday. A parent who is not feeding their kid is probably not helping them with their homework and other things associated with their education. nloBreaking News,its not a russian invasion,its neverez2014-03-07 03:38:31work place violence. Obama heads to golf course. I'm glad that was explained. nloI don't think Cummings had a question, It was neverez2014-03-07 03:33:48likely to have been an anti Republican accusation.eugI have to tip my hat to those who ibRightandLeft2014-03-07 03:24:36can have a moment of clarity and be struck different in an instant. I've had the pleasure of watching a few in my lifetime. Being poor doesn't preclude someone from having a happy life. The loss of spirit regardless of the reason and for society to write them off is morally repugnant to me. chaBefore you talk shit about Thursday's episode 2014-03-07 03:15:14I *dare* you to watch it, and see if you don't feel just a little bit like an idiot afterwards, particularly if you've been pushing FOX's talking points.eugI did some stupid shit when I was young 2014-03-07 03:13:37I made some interesting choices. Eventually I was homeless and stoned all the time. When I just about hit rock bottom and felt like any further would be the end of my life and any hope of improving it, I pulled myself up by my bootstraps and got *back in* to software engineering and well up into the middle class and never went back. That was over 25 years ago. But I already had a skill, and it was hard to make it happen even with my background. All those things you just said, I lived. I know it from both sides, and I know what happens on the street. I know what it feels like. I know what it does to one's perspective. I know how alienated and out of touch one can get. I know it.eugI don't think my personal situation is relevent ibRightandLeft2014-03-07 03:05:49to understanding how difficult it is for people who have reached hopeless. I have a grasp on someone telling a homeless person to "get a job" Hell, they would like to get out of the rain, get a shower, get the impossible grime off their skin before they have to go grub for bus fare to find a non existent pay phone to call on an ad in a two week old newspaper. I also understand the difference between eating quality food and not having any food....and the large definition between those too ends. Point is the basics are provided for people in this country that actually lifts them out of the poverty definition, but doesn't fix the problem. We have proven that throwing untold sums of money doesn't cure it.sdowhy don't they get a better job? ibRightandLeft2014-03-07 02:57:47simple evolutionary fact is that man adjusts to his environment and that is key to success. They institutionalize people who think the environment has to be changed to suit them. In the past those people merely died. what is a livable wage? How much discretionary money is included? I think the livable wage argument is an admission of failure of the education system in the country. And the government programs are the livable wage. I prefer to see everyone provide for those people than put it off on a small minority to support them.unkI hear the wildflowers are quite a sight too dzastrus2014-03-07 02:52:08Spring's coming. Enjoy.eugmuch like poverty rates ibRightandLeft2014-03-07 02:49:38these numbers are always counted prior to the programs application. The poverty fighters in this country are food stamps, wics, which also provides price support to farmers, Medicaid and 238 vouchers. After those and the other less frequent government transfers, the poverty level is pretty much non existent as defined by the government. That's not the same as saying poverty has been cured....but the basic needs supplements have been given. Now if people sacrifice food to buy new sneakers, I am not sure how much education they can be given to change those choices. eugPart V soup_to_nuts2014-03-07 02:38:14
Ever since President Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1964, the government has worked diligently to ensure that no American goes hungry. For years, the USDA flooded communities with surplus commodities such as cheese and butter. Enrollment in the food stamp program (now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), the front-line federal weapon in the fight against hunger, is at an all-time high, with 42.4 million people receiving support. Yet the number of Americans who struggle to put food on their tables has never decreased. This is because hunger isn't about food. It's about jobs and wages. The passage of living-wage laws, tariffs that protect U.S. jobs and comprehensive public health care - coupled with consumer support for businesses that pay good wages, reinvest in their communities or embrace green polices - would do more to combat hunger than anything charities have tried in the past five decades. Incentives for local food production would keep us healthy and our local economies thriving. For example, D.C. Central Kitchen, which I founded in 1989, provides locally sourced, made-from-scratch meals for public and charter schools in Washington as well as for clients of Fresh Start, our catering company. In the middle of a recession, we just added 30 well-paid employees who receive benefits, many from our own job-training program. Last year, 80 of our graduates, many of them felons or former drug addicts, earned more than $2 million in salaries and paid more than $200,000 in local payroll taxes. And while learning new skills, they produced more than 1.4 million healthy meals for shelters and food programs. What we are doing isn't unique. It's happening all over America, and it isn't charity - it's rock-solid business.sdotrolling is too. I'm not saying you should soup_to_nuts2014-03-07 02:15:50go cold turkey, but a little less every day until you stop should do it.eugI get my news from many sources. But Jon Stewart soup_to_nuts2014-03-07 02:10:51caught you guys big time, better than anyone on WoPo for your Putin vs. Obama bullshit. You don't want to see that, your own changing positions on Obama makes you look like the biggest fucking hypocritical idiot puppets imaginable. Just your own icons statements in the media over time. You won't believe the flip-flop. Fucking awesome! Way to go Jon!sdoI admit libs are really sensitive people ibRightandLeft2014-03-07 02:09:00they are frequently at unease with their neighbors around them, particularly if they perceive them to be poor. What can we do to improve the living conditions of the poor in this country? Heck they live pretty darn well now in relation to the rest of the world. Conservatives aren't as weepy as libs about poor people because the truth is, a very small percentage of the impoverished in this country are in dire straits. it's highly unlikely that 1 in six kids goes to bed with an empty stomach and the few that do are victims of their parents rather than society as a whole. Why spend a whole lot of effort on a minimum wage when it would be better to focus on fostering a business friendly environment that would encourage economic activity and direct investment of capital. eugI knew it! Daily Show covered Putin/Obama soup_to_nuts2014-03-07 01:36:37and GOP's treatment of them. Must see Thursday's Daily Show! Jon Stewart did an awesome segment on it! Gotta see those videos.unki've learned more about gay sex from CLcons than FaantaStat2014-03-07 01:28:10from any other source!lnkFirst Lady Michelle Obama FROG-452014-03-07 01:21:59 Hi, everyone -- We never know what curveballs life is going to throw at us. But we do know that those curveballs come. That's why it's so important that everyone -- including healthy young adults -- sign up for health insurance and get our friends and family to sign up, too. Yesterday, I traveled to Miami to meet with folks doing extraordinary work on the ground to get more people health coverage -- and I took over the @MichelleObama Instagram account to share it all with you. Check out what my day looked like yesterday -- then help me get the word out. Take a look at my day (Naw, I not going to post it) I mean as songwriter § commie__bastard2014-03-07 01:01:42unkYoung Republicans confirm that their peers hate lie______detector2014-03-07 01:01:30Young Republicans confirm that their peers hate Republicans Nope, not voting GOP anytime soon. If ever. So the college Republicans commission a report to find out why their peers hate their party so much, and we can sit there and laugh that they spent money to discover the obvious: Words that up-for-grabs voters associate with the GOP: “The responses were brutal: closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned.” But there were some nuggets of good info in there, such as one-quarter of young voters won't even consider voting for a candidate who holds anti-gay views. I'm telling you, the millennials are changing this country for the better. On the other hand, we can go back to laughing when we see how these young Republicans react to that info: “On the ‘open-minded’ issue, yes, we will face serious difficulty so long as the issue of gay marriage remains on the table,” the authors wrote. “In the short term, the party ought to promote the diversity of thought within its ranks and make clear that we welcome healthy debate on the policy topic at hand.”unkANOTHER Florida Republican jumps to Dems... Ne lie______detector2014-03-07 00:58:34ANOTHER Florida Republican jumps to Dems... Neither party is ever glad when one of their own abandons their ranks to join the other team, but when a Hispanic woman in a swing state changes her registration from Republican to Democrat, it likely stings a little more. Former state Rep. Ana Rivas Logan is leaving the Republican Party, she announced Monday. She plans to register as a Democrat, she said. “The GOP of today is not the party I joined,” said Rivas Logan, who also served on the Miami-Dade School Board. “It’s not the party of my parents. It’s a party that has been radicalized and held hostage by a group of extremists.” In an interview with the Tampa Bay Times, Rivas Logan described the Republican Party as “a party that attacks women and minorities – and one that asked me, and my former Hispanic Republican colleagues in the Florida legislature, to turn on their own people by supporting extreme anti-immigrant policies.” And if this sounds vaguely familiar, there’s a good reason. Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist recently made one of the more notable switches in recent memory, not only becoming a Democrat, but positioning himself for another statewide campaign with his new party, making similar remarks about the state GOP. What’s more, note that Rivas Logan’s story is not dissimilar to that of Pablo Pantoja, who, up until last spring, served as the state director of Florida Hispanic Outreach for the Republican National Committee. Then he switched, too. Pantoja said last May, after becoming a Democrat and making a contribution to the ACLU, “It doesn’t take much to see the culture of intolerance surrounding the Republican Party today.” Obviously, it’d be a mistake to extrapolate too much from two individuals changing their party affiliation, but given that the RNC is trying to boost its minority outreach efforts, it’s not at all helpful when folks like Rivas Logan and Pantoja make a splash by crossing the aisle.
Hunger is about food.
Ever since President Lyndon Johnson declared war on poverty in 1964, the government has worked diligently to ensure that no American goes hungry. For years, the USDA flooded communities with surplus commodities such as cheese and butter. Enrollment in the food stamp program (now called the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), the front-line federal weapon in the fight against hunger, is at an all-time high, with 42.4 million people receiving support. Yet the number of Americans who struggle to put food on their tables has never decreased. This is because hunger isn't about food. It's about jobs and wages. The passage of living-wage laws, tariffs that protect U.S. jobs and comprehensive public health care - coupled with consumer support for businesses that pay good wages, reinvest in their communities or embrace green polices - would do more to combat hunger than anything charities have tried in the past five decades. Incentives for local food production would keep us healthy and our local economies thriving. For example, D.C. Central Kitchen, which I founded in 1989, provides locally sourced, made-from-scratch meals for public and charter schools in Washington as well as for clients of Fresh Start, our catering company. In the middle of a recession, we just added 30 well-paid employees who receive benefits, many from our own job-training program. Last year, 80 of our graduates, many of them felons or former drug addicts, earned more than $2 million in salaries and paid more than $200,000 in local payroll taxes. And while learning new skills, they produced more than 1.4 million healthy meals for shelters and food programs. What we are doing isn't unique. It's happening all over America, and it isn't charity - it's rock-solid business.sdotrolling is too. I'm not saying you should soup_to_nuts2014-03-07 02:15:50go cold turkey, but a little less every day until you stop should do it.eugI get my news from many sources. But Jon Stewart soup_to_nuts2014-03-07 02:10:51caught you guys big time, better than anyone on WoPo for your Putin vs. Obama bullshit. You don't want to see that, your own changing positions on Obama makes you look like the biggest fucking hypocritical idiot puppets imaginable. Just your own icons statements in the media over time. You won't believe the flip-flop. Fucking awesome! Way to go Jon!sdoI admit libs are really sensitive people ibRightandLeft2014-03-07 02:09:00they are frequently at unease with their neighbors around them, particularly if they perceive them to be poor. What can we do to improve the living conditions of the poor in this country? Heck they live pretty darn well now in relation to the rest of the world. Conservatives aren't as weepy as libs about poor people because the truth is, a very small percentage of the impoverished in this country are in dire straits. it's highly unlikely that 1 in six kids goes to bed with an empty stomach and the few that do are victims of their parents rather than society as a whole. Why spend a whole lot of effort on a minimum wage when it would be better to focus on fostering a business friendly environment that would encourage economic activity and direct investment of capital. eugI knew it! Daily Show covered Putin/Obama soup_to_nuts2014-03-07 01:36:37and GOP's treatment of them. Must see Thursday's Daily Show! Jon Stewart did an awesome segment on it! Gotta see those videos.unki've learned more about gay sex from CLcons than FaantaStat2014-03-07 01:28:10from any other source!lnkFirst Lady Michelle Obama FROG-452014-03-07 01:21:59 Hi, everyone -- We never know what curveballs life is going to throw at us. But we do know that those curveballs come. That's why it's so important that everyone -- including healthy young adults -- sign up for health insurance and get our friends and family to sign up, too. Yesterday, I traveled to Miami to meet with folks doing extraordinary work on the ground to get more people health coverage -- and I took over the @MichelleObama Instagram account to share it all with you. Check out what my day looked like yesterday -- then help me get the word out. Take a look at my day (Naw, I not going to post it) I mean as songwriter § commie__bastard2014-03-07 01:01:42unkYoung Republicans confirm that their peers hate lie______detector2014-03-07 01:01:30Young Republicans confirm that their peers hate Republicans Nope, not voting GOP anytime soon. If ever. So the college Republicans commission a report to find out why their peers hate their party so much, and we can sit there and laugh that they spent money to discover the obvious: Words that up-for-grabs voters associate with the GOP: “The responses were brutal: closed-minded, racist, rigid, old-fashioned.” But there were some nuggets of good info in there, such as one-quarter of young voters won't even consider voting for a candidate who holds anti-gay views. I'm telling you, the millennials are changing this country for the better. On the other hand, we can go back to laughing when we see how these young Republicans react to that info: “On the ‘open-minded’ issue, yes, we will face serious difficulty so long as the issue of gay marriage remains on the table,” the authors wrote. “In the short term, the party ought to promote the diversity of thought within its ranks and make clear that we welcome healthy debate on the policy topic at hand.”unkANOTHER Florida Republican jumps to Dems... Ne lie______detector2014-03-07 00:58:34ANOTHER Florida Republican jumps to Dems... Neither party is ever glad when one of their own abandons their ranks to join the other team, but when a Hispanic woman in a swing state changes her registration from Republican to Democrat, it likely stings a little more. Former state Rep. Ana Rivas Logan is leaving the Republican Party, she announced Monday. She plans to register as a Democrat, she said. “The GOP of today is not the party I joined,” said Rivas Logan, who also served on the Miami-Dade School Board. “It’s not the party of my parents. It’s a party that has been radicalized and held hostage by a group of extremists.” In an interview with the Tampa Bay Times, Rivas Logan described the Republican Party as “a party that attacks women and minorities – and one that asked me, and my former Hispanic Republican colleagues in the Florida legislature, to turn on their own people by supporting extreme anti-immigrant policies.” And if this sounds vaguely familiar, there’s a good reason. Former Florida Gov. Charlie Crist recently made one of the more notable switches in recent memory, not only becoming a Democrat, but positioning himself for another statewide campaign with his new party, making similar remarks about the state GOP. What’s more, note that Rivas Logan’s story is not dissimilar to that of Pablo Pantoja, who, up until last spring, served as the state director of Florida Hispanic Outreach for the Republican National Committee. Then he switched, too. Pantoja said last May, after becoming a Democrat and making a contribution to the ACLU, “It doesn’t take much to see the culture of intolerance surrounding the Republican Party today.” Obviously, it’d be a mistake to extrapolate too much from two individuals changing their party affiliation, but given that the RNC is trying to boost its minority outreach efforts, it’s not at all helpful when folks like Rivas Logan and Pantoja make a splash by crossing the aisle.
This post has been generated by Page2RSS
via forums - craigslist http://ift.tt/O1ezl1
No comments:
Post a Comment